ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial has constituted two bigger and 4 common benches on the principal seat Islamabad to listen to quite a lot of vital instances throughout the week ranging from Monday.
On Monday (June 13), the five-member bigger bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan, Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel and Justice Sajjad Ali Shah would hear petition filed by former Islamabad Excessive Court docket’s decide Shaukat Aziz SIddiqui searching for the apex courtroom to put aside of report/opinion of Supreme Judicial Council and Notification issued by Ministry of Legislation dated October 11, 2018.
On Tuesday, a five-member bigger bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar would hear suo moto discover case on apprehension of undermining the Felony Justice System by individuals in authority. The bench one would comprise of Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, on Tuesday the primary bench would comprise of Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar.
From Wednesday, the bench one would comprise of Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Ayesha A Malik. The second bench would comprise of Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan whereas the third bench would comprise of Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan, Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail.
From Wednesday, the bench two would comprise of Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan, Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah and Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi would kind the fourth bench.
The benches will hear many vital instances together with service and pension issues of presidency staff, academic establishments issues, labour instances, appeals towards loss of life sentences and life imprisonment, appeals towards acquittal of accused in homicide and corruption instances, bail appeals in NAB instances, election petitions of various politicians, post-arrest bail plea filed by Shahabuddin relating to misappropriation of Funds of TMA by City Committee Bavrani, Larkana, Sindh, completely different flour mills petitions searching for allocation of wheat quota, Particular Secretary-II (Legislation & Order), Dwelling Tribal Affairs Division, Authorities of KP.
Furthermore, the SC would hear NAB attraction searching for enhancement of sentence for accused Muhammad Anwar and others as they private illegally allotted land at Taluka Shaheed Fazil Rahoo, Sindh and that is the violation of land grant coverage, 1989, NAB attraction searching for cancellation of bail of accused Dawoodi Morkas accused of being Administrators of M/s ASML and approved signatory of its checking account in Sindh Financial institution, Clifton Department, Karachi, acquired Rs.120 million from Govt. of Sindh.
Shahid Mehmood petition searching for re-opening of inquiry closed by NAB initiated on the data shared by the Petitioner with this Court docket in HRC No.30904-P/2013 relating to Corruption, Embezzlement, Mismanagement of public assets in BISP, post-arrest bail plea of Muhammad Ramzan and in response to NAB the Petitioner, Ex-SE Pakistan Works Division was arrested by the NAB Authorities in investigation dated 14.09.2020 on the allegation that he has amassed property past his recognized sources of earnings / many properties in his identify and within the identify of his benamidars, Pakistan Worldwide Airline Pilots Affiliation petition searching for basic rights of retired Pilots/Calculation of Pension and Pakistan Ladies Guides Affiliation petition relating to land in possession of Ladies Information Affiliation, Punjab.
In keeping with trigger lists, no adjournment on any floor will probably be granted and no utility for adjournment by means of fax will probably be positioned earlier than the courtroom. Moreover, if the counsel is unable to look for any cause, the advocate-on-record will probably be required to argue the case.